Keep research with the assignment
Bring approved sources, interview notes, and references into a shared workspace. Prepare briefs with links, flag conflicting facts, and keep unanswered questions available for editors.
Media & publishing / CanadaConnect the steps
Connect the steps
in your publishing process.
We build publishing tools, research workspaces, and connected content workflows. Our commercial experience includes BestReviews and Reachli.
Where technology can helpWhat we can
What we can
help you do.
Connect production and review
Bring briefs, scripts, assets, reviews, and publishing checks together. Track versions and owners. AI can draft or adapt approved formats while the team reviews quality, attribution, and readiness.
Improve the publishing experience
Build publication interfaces and internal content tools. Improve mobile reading, search, structured content, and integrations. Measure completed editorial work and audience behaviour.
A practical first project
Connect one repeatable production workflow.
Choose a format your team produces regularly. Map the sources, roles and review steps, then implement the highest-friction handoff with examples of accepted work and clear publishing authority.
- 01A production brief and documented review sequence
- 02A working research or publishing tool
- 03Acceptance examples and a release checklist
Define success before deliveryHow we measure
How we measure
success.
Agree these measures at the start of a new project and use them to review progress.
- Unsupported statements and missing source references measured during editorial review.
- Revision rounds and time from approved brief to release-ready material tracked.
- Mobile reading performance and content discovery measured on representative pages.
What the workflow can look like
A publishing team can connect a brief, approved sources, draft preparation, editorial review, and release tracking. Software can preserve references, record revisions, and show which stage is waiting. AI may organize research or prepare drafts while editors determine accuracy, tone, rights, and readiness to publish.
What we establish together
Start with a recurring format and examples of accepted and rejected work. Define the editorial owner, source permissions, platform interfaces, and publication authority. Make handoffs and corrections visible. Evaluate acceptance, revision effort, source accuracy, and cycle time together so draft volume does not conceal more editorial work.
Common questions
Can you connect an existing content management system?
Yes. We review its interfaces, content model and publishing permissions before agreeing an integration or custom editing experience.
How do you handle creative approval?
The brief identifies the responsible creative or editorial lead and the work requiring review. Published material follows the authority your team defines.
Can a workflow create several formats from one approved source?
Yes, where the source and rights permit it. We scope format rules and evaluate factual consistency, creative acceptance and revision effort.
Related services
Find help for your team
Discuss a project
Discuss your projectPlan a first release.
Describe the workflow, existing systems, and result you need. We’ll discuss the scope and next step.